Science visualization trends of 2021

Reviewing a year of data viz

At the end of the year people take stock and reminisce. This also applies to data visualization scientists. Reviews summarizing the best visualizations of 2021 were published. I particularly enjoy Maarten Lambrechts summary of all the “Best of 2021” posts.

This year, while musing whether to keep or toss my Nature print issues (still undecided!), I browsed the science visualizations of 2021. Well, I checked those about biology and medicine as I really do not understand enough of physics to get the visualizations in Nature. Some visualizations and themes really stood out so I decided to summarize for you the top 10 science visualization trends of 2021 – enjoy!

[note: all photos show anonymous excerpts for educational purposes from Nature articles 2021]

[Go here for German translation]

  1. Viva viridis!

The viridis color-scheme is now omnipresent. Viridis was developed by Stefan van der Walt and Nathaniel Smith in 2015 as the default sequential color map for matplotlib. Their goal was to create a color scheme in which color changes are perceptually uniform, and to replace the non-linear Jet/Rainbow-color schemes used previously for sequential data.

Viridis quickly gained popularity as we can see in the many examples below. By now viridis is however no longer only used for sequential data. Instead we also see it being applied to diverging and categorical data, which may be not exactly ideal at times. But for now let’s celebrate the end of rainbow color schemes!

2. Still trending: axis breaks

Yes, axis breaks, necessary or not, are unfortunately still a thing in 2021. And so far, no end in sight. Every time I teach a Data Viz Course, I challenge the students that all axis breaks are avoidable – I have yet to see one where the break really was necessary. Send me yours!

3. Hello slope-charts

In 2016 the #BarBarChart initiative called for a ban of bar charts for data distributions. They were successful and I have not any in 2021. At that time, Tracey Weissgerber published a notable paper encouraging the use of a slope chart for dependent observations. It seems the science world listened again: numerous papers now use slope charts to illustrate dependent measurements of specimens, for example mice before and after treatment, responders and non-responders in cohorts etc.


There don’t seem to be any papers that don’t have at least one dimension reduction plot. t-SNE, UMAP and PCA are omnipresent. These plots are however rarely explained in articles and figure legends, and I suspect even more rarely understood by audiences. In my courses participants are often not familiar with them – not surprising given that they are a recent addition in statistics and still heavily researched in the vis community! To educate your students refer them to these resources from Claus O. Wilke and StatQuest.

5. Mixing charts

A big fashion trend of 2021 was mixing styles and patterns, and it seems this did spill over to the visualization world. Researchers have become quite experimental with mixing chart types (see also earlier post). I’ve seen a number of scatter plots showing the data distribution summarized along each axis: above for the x-axis and left for the y-axis. I’ve also seen pie charts summarizing the quadrants of a scatter-plot, charts mixing violin and box-plots, of course box-plots with data points, and many more.

6. Pictograms

Often novel insights come from a new methodological approach. To familiarize audiences with a new method, papers now regularly include a sketch of the experimental procedure. And, good news, these have begun to look rather nice and clear, whether it’s a stool preparation method, an approach stem cell differentiation, or for a mouse neurobiology set-up.

7. Pictograms for labeling

Pictograms are not only used for explaining procedures, but also often help to quickly orient audiences. Pictograms are for example used instead of text: I’ve seen pictograms as a title, pictogram to name a leaf in a phylogenetic tree, or even a pictogram chart. Overall pictograms seem to be most popular in mouse molecular genetics and evolutionary biology. Go figure.

8. Images now come with scale bars!

Scale bars in images are apparently here to stay. A few years ago, I had noticed that scale information was quite often missing in scientific images, even in high profile journals. Eventually this observation prompted a collaborative project to systematically screen the quality of image data in publications.

This year the tide has definitely shifted. Except for a few cases, scale bars are now visibly placed on all images; even in plant and histology images, two fields so far quite notorious for omitting scale information.

9. Colors in images: still problematic

Despite many recent efforts, most recently a technology feature in nature feat. your truly, no end is in sight for images that generously mix red and green, making it illegible for many color-blind people. In addition, often images that show false-color scales do not come with a legend explaining the color intensities. A small glimpse of hope: I’ve seen a color legend once this year (still without quantities in legend), which is already a 100% increase from previous years!

And, rescue is near, with QUAREP we have a collaborative consortium addressing quality of light microscopy. Join our working group that develops guidelines for image visualization in publications!

10. More space for figures!

Figures get more space in publications. This is quite easy in electronic publications, but also in print editions half or even full-page figures are becoming a sight. This makes it quite enjoyable to read some of the figures, which before were entirely illegible due to being squeezed into a small space.

More space for figures means less space for other sections of a paper. Often materials and methods are now entirely moved to the supplementary materials and citations are limited to a few only.

These figures below for example each took up 2/3 of a page – lovely!


5 thoughts on “Science visualization trends of 2021

  1. Helena, thanks for a lovely and interesting summary. The only observation that startled me was 9: “A small glimpse of hope: I’ve seen a color legend once this year (still without quantities in legend), which is already a 100% increase from previous years!”. Are you implying that previous years had only half a colour legend per year or that you found colour legends only once every two years?

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Fantastic and very valuable summary, many thanks! I agree that pictograms are a very welcome development – makes papers far more accessible.

    As an aside, do you know how significance for mass spec volcano plots are obtained? That’s one of my longstanding gripes. I know what the plots are telling me but I don’t know how they’re doing it…

    Liked by 1 person

    1. The Mann group explain their volcano plot in Nina Hubner’s 2010 Journal of Cell Biology paper ( They perform a standard t-test assuming equal group variance and compare pull-downs with controls (after zero-filling the data using a strategy that is also described in the paper). At the end of the day, though, you can use any statistic that yields information about the confidence you have that a change between the two conditions that are being compared has occurred.
      The R-scripts that were used in Nina Hubner’s paper are downloadable and there are by now a few different libraries available (e.g. msVolcano, described in Sukhdeep Singh’s paper from the MKax Planck institute in Dresden

      Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.